the banality of ignorance
A minister should not be
superior to the law. oh, well: nobody should be superior to the law.
In Italy, a minister thinks
that he should not be put on trial because he says he acted in the interests ofthe state.
According to his interpretation
a minister (who has made certain promises in the election campaign) and a
government can violate the law, if they say they act for the interest of the
state.
A pronouncement (by the Senateauthorization junta) favorable to the minister could expose our democracy to
easily imaginable risks; if a minister can order to segregate people, outside
of any law, what should we expect from the government?
It has been pointed out to me
that I write very banal things in a very ungrammatical way. I know. The point
is this: I want to learn to write in English about topics that are not the
apple on the table, the book in the backpack…
So I have to write simple
sentences on trivial subjects (and what is more trivial than a cunning minister?)
Comments
Post a Comment