the banality of ignorance




A minister should not be superior to the law. oh, well: nobody should be superior to the law.

In Italy, a minister thinks that he should not be put on trial because he says he acted in the interests ofthe state.

According to his interpretation a minister (who has made certain promises in the election campaign) and a government can violate the law, if they say they act for the interest of the state.

A pronouncement (by the Senateauthorization junta) favorable to the minister could expose our democracy to easily imaginable risks; if a minister can order to segregate people, outside of any law, what should we expect from the government?

It has been pointed out to me that I write very banal things in a very ungrammatical way. I know. The point is this: I want to learn to write in English about topics that are not the apple on the table, the book in the backpack…

So I have to write simple sentences on trivial subjects (and what is more trivial than a cunning minister?)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Short memory and long memory

Shit afternoon

To born males